First experience with FFA-U

[Cricri]

Hi everybody,

I will share my first experience of FFA-U with everybody.

I went to a so called "gamblecenter" in my country (sort of casino but only electronics) and played  roulette with air propulsed ball.
First the layout was a bit special, it was with 0 and 00 (but not american layout) it was French layout and they squeezed the 00 between number 23 and 5. For more information http://www.elaut.com/home.php?section=2

While no more bets was still possible even after ball release  (I estimate +-6 sec) ... there still where 2 major problems.

First I observed about 50 spins and no particular DD was spotted .. so I decided to play IQE6 acc1.

But I encountered two huge problems:

1) The rotor was accelerating just before ball release (2,5sec/rotation) but was also programmed to deccelerate while ball was rotating, so when ball eventually hit rotor the rotor speed was  3,5 sec/rotation. So it was decelerating 1 sec on +- 12 ball rotaions. 
This means that if you clocked the rotor at ball release, this was not accurate anymore when ball hitted rotor.
I'm not going to explain in detail (because a bit too difficult) how I managed to clock rotor for correct rotation-time but after 2-3 hours I succeded.

But now biggest problem was this:
The ball made in general about let's say 12 rotations but the 5 first rotations had VEEERRRY SLOW deccelerations ... but then between rotation 5 and 6 I had some BETTER deccelaration ... so the system was able to give prediction on the 6th ball clocking ... AND GUESS WHAT ....  I ALLWAYS GET PREDICTION .... BUT AT SAME TIME "NO BETTING".
My predictions where .... AMAZING .... SPOT ON (as Forester would say) .... AND THIS  ALMOST 7/10.
But I had always the same problem ... when system was able to calculate GOOD decceleration and give prediction ... It was at exaclty same time that "NO BETTING" was called.
I where lucky on 2 or 3 occasions to still bet ... but for all other times it was very frustrating because almost all prediction where right and I couldn't place bet.

So any advise on getting prediction from system earlier is always welcome???

I also want to mention IQE6 acc1 give prediction always 1 ball rotations earlier then IQE6 AMERICAN acc1, this was the case for the wheel as I explained above. Is there any particular reason for this?

Regards,


Cricri

[forester]

Hey Circi,

Thanks for letting us know.

I decided to play IQE6 acc1.

You shouldn't play AC1, but AC2, AC1 is only for some current experiments.
Anyway in your case I think it wouldn't make any difference it would be same as AC2.
 
You can clock rotor as that as long as change is constant.

AND GUESS WHAT ....  I ALLWAYS GET PREDICTION .... BUT AT SAME TIME "NO BETTING".
My predictions where .... AMAZING .... SPOT ON (as Forester would say) .... AND THIS  ALMOST 7/10.

But I had always the same problem ... when system was able to calculate GOOD decceleration and give prediction ... It was at exaclty same time that "NO BETTING" was called.
I where lucky on 2 or 3 occasions to still bet ... but for all other times it was very frustrating because almost all prediction where right and I couldn't place bet.

Well it is hard with faster ball you would lose some accuracy.
System is set for ranges that are acceptable for leveled wheel prediction.
Older program has one step earlier but nobody used it.

I looked AC1 settings and made an interesting modification for that part.
First spin do clocking until you come to ball speed that you like. Then stop, and next spins the system will target that particular range. I did it on 0.7s ball and still getting ok results. However it is not perfect solution, it is only a test. I may need to make it adjustable back and forward few rotations, because it would be hard for you to know when is the right ball speed. For example clock until NMB, then set it for 2 -3 rotations back and play most optimized game. 

   

I also want to mention IQE6 acc1 give prediction always 1 ball rotations earlier then IQE6 AMERICAN acc1, this was the case for the wheel as I explained above. Is there any particular reason for this?

Definitely not, it may be that you took another sample, or coincidence that you were predicting on the end of time frame. The difference is only which number the system will pronounce. The system first gets data about ball position then converts it to number on the wheel. I'll write a bit more about this in development section.

[Cricri]

Hi Forester,

For example clock until NMB, then set it for 2 -3 rotations back and play most optimized game.

What do you exactly mean by: "set it for 2-3 rotations back"?

I tried to clock 6 ball revolutions on a DVD until I think the system (at gamecenter)would be calling NMB and then I selected IQE6 Acc2 .... when I clock spins ... I always receieved ERROR1???

Regards,

Cricri

[Cricri]

Hi Forester,

I also have other questions.
Let's say I clocked about 10 ball revolutions for SETUP and we know that system nomally only will give prediction after 6 th ball clocking( which is same moment as NMB).
What if I clock uncorrectly on purpose:
Let's say the direction is ACW and on rotation number 2 and 3 (from the beginning) I want do as if I was clocking rotation 5 to 6 so instead of clocking from 12 o'clock D to 12 o'clock D, I would clock from 12 o'clock D to let's say 11 o'clock and next spin  I would clock again from 12 o'clock D to 9'30 o'clock. So this way I will get prediction after 4th spin. Do you think I could get any accurate prediction this way???

Regards,

Cricri

[forester]

Huh, you can't do it please read
http://rouletteplace.com/index.php/topic,659.msg7235/topicseen.html#msg7235


System doesn't care how many rotations you clocked, it only cares what is the ball speed.
So no you can't get earlier prediction.

Error1 is rotor clocking to long, or if you clocked rotor earlier then 25.5 sec before then ball drops.